Moose Pick STD

STD's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes STD look like a outstanding bargain.

STD's P/E is only slimly lower than it's historical average. 8.5 P/E makes STD look like a outstanding buy. And price to book is very attractive. Looks like a keen buy overall.

STD's cash from operating is positive, which is outstanding. It also is growing, which is extremely great. Std's net cash change is positive, which is outstanding. It also is growing, which is exceedingly keen.

STD's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance STD's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

STD @ google finance

Banco Santander, S.A.'s Moose Rating: 93%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick IMKTA

IMKTA's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. Even so 0.8 is decent, but there are more likely better bargains.

IMKTA's P/E is only slightly lower than it's historical average. 9.4 P/E makes IMKTA look like a keen bargain. And price to book is exceedingly attractive. Looks like a swell buy overall.

IMKTA's cash from operating is positive, which is outstanding. Even so it is not growing, which is not so outstanding. Imkta's net cash change is positive, which is swell. It also is growing, which is extremely outstanding.

IMKTA's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance IMKTA's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

IMKTA @ google finance

Ingles Markets Inc.'s Moose Rating: 84%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick ISH

ISH's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. 0.5 price to book makes ISH look like a swell buy.

ISH's P/E is only slenderly lower than it's historical average. 5.9 P/E makes ISH look like a swell bargain. And price to book is exceedingly attractive. Looks like a great buy overall.

ISH's cash from operating is positive, which is great. It also is growing, which is exceedingly swell. Ish's net cash change is negative, which is bad. Also it is not growing, which is exceedingly bad.

ISH's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance ISH's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

ISH @ google finance

International Shipholding Corp.'s Moose Rating: 85%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick NYB

NYB's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. Nevertheless 1.0 is at best ordinary. May be acceptable for an exceedingly well known business. Otherwise it's probably best to put your money elsewhere.

NYB's P/E is only slightly lower than it's historical average. 10.2 P/E makes NYB look like a great purchase. However The price to book is not that attractive, which is means it's probably best to keep looking.

NYB's cash from operating is positive, which is swell. However it is not growing, which is not so swell. Nyb's net cash change is positive, which is great. It also is growing, which is very swell.

NYB's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance NYB's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

NYB @ google finance

New York Community Bancorp Inc.'s Moose Rating: 82%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick SHI

SHI's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. Even so 0.9 is at best ordinary. May be acceptable for an very well known business. Otherwise it's probably best to put your money elsewhere.

The P/E ratio for SHI is considerably lower than it's historical average. 8.9 P/E makes SHI look like a outstanding deal. All the same The price to book is not that attractive, which is means it's probably best to keep looking.

SHI's cash from operating is positive, which is keen. It also is growing, which is exceedingly keen. Shi's net cash change is negative, which is bad. Also it is not growing, which is exceedingly bad.

SHI's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance SHI's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

SHI @ google finance

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co. Ltd.'s Moose Rating: 77%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick STM

The price to book ratio for STM is considerably lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes STM look like a keen buy.

The P/E ratio for STM is considerably lower than it's historical average. 5.8 P/E makes STM look like a outstanding bargain. And price to book is very attractive. Looks like a great buy overall.

STM's cash from operating is positive, which is swell. All the same it is not growing, which is not so outstanding. Stm's net cash change is positive, which is outstanding. It also is growing, which is extremely outstanding.

STM's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance STM's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

STM @ google finance

STMicroelectronics NV's Moose Rating: 93%

This pick was made August 13, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick TNE

TNE's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes TNE look like a swell buy.

TNE's P/E is only slightly lower than it's historical average. 6.7 P/E makes TNE look like a keen deal. And price to book is very attractive. Looks like a swell buy overall.

TNE's cash from operating is positive, which is keen. It also is growing, which is very great. Tne's net cash change is positive, which is keen. However it is not growing, which is not so great.

TNE's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance TNE's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

TNE @ google finance

Tele Norte Leste Participacoes S.A.'s Moose Rating: 90%

This pick was made August 9, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick TTO

TTO's price to book is slightly lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes TTO look like a keen bargain.

The P/E ratio for TTO is considerably lower than it's historical average. 3.3 P/E makes TTO look like a great purchase. And price to book is extremely attractive. Looks like a swell buy overall.

TTO's cash from operating is negative, which is bad. Still it is growing, which is good. Tto's net cash change is negative, which is bad. Also it is not growing, which is exceedingly bad.

TTO's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance TTO's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

TTO @ google finance

Tortoise Capital Resources Corp.'s Moose Rating: 80%

This pick was made August 9, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick KEQU

KEQU's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes KEQU look like a outstanding buy.

KEQU's P/E is only slimly lower than it's historical average. 12.2 P/E makes KEQU look like a swell buy. And price to book is very attractive. Looks like a outstanding buy overall.

KEQU's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance KEQU's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

KEQU @ google finance

Kewaunee Scientific Corp.'s Moose Rating: NaN%

This pick was made August 9, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.