Moose Pick TTO

TTO's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. 0.7 price to book makes TTO look like a great purchase.

TTO's P/E is only somewhat lower than it's historical average. 5.8 P/E makes TTO look like a keen buy. And price to book is very attractive. Looks like a swell buy overall.

TTO's cash from operating is negative, which is bad. Even so it is growing, which is good. Tto's net cash change is negative, which is bad. Also it is not growing, which is exceedingly bad.

TTO's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for tto.

TTO @ google finance

Tortoise Capital Resources Corp's Moose Rating: 75%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick NBTF

NBTF's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. Yet 0.8 is decent, but there are more likely better bargains.

NBTF's P/E is only somewhat lower than it's historical average. 14.8 P/E makes NBTF look like a great bargain. And price to book is extremely attractive. Looks like a great buy overall.

NBTF's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for nbtf.

NBTF @ google finance

NB&T Financial Group Inc.'s Moose Rating: NaN%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick MFA

MFA's price to book is slightly lower than it's historical average. Even so 0.8 is decent, but there are more likely better bargains.

The P/E ratio for MFA is considerably lower than it's historical average. 6.5 P/E makes MFA look like a great bargain. And price to book is extremely attractive. Looks like a swell buy overall.

MFA's cash from operating is positive, which is outstanding. It also is growing, which is extremely outstanding. Mfa's net cash change is positive, which is great. All the same it is not growing, which is not so keen.

MFA's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for mfa.

MFA @ google finance

MFA Financial, Inc.'s Moose Rating: 79%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick TPI

The price to book ratio for TPI is considerably lower than it's historical average. 0.4 price to book makes TPI look like a great deal.

The P/E ratio for TPI is considerably lower than it's historical average. 2.0 P/E makes TPI look like a keen purchase. And price to book is exceedingly attractive. Looks like a keen buy overall.

TPI's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance TPI's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

TPI @ google finance

Tianyin Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.'s Moose Rating: NaN%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick ACNB

ACNB's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. However 0.9 is at best mediocre. May be acceptable for an extremely well known business. Otherwise it's probably best to put your money elsewhere.

ACNB's P/E is only somewhat lower than it's historical average. 10.1 P/E makes ACNB look like a great bargain. All the same The price to book is not that attractive, which is means it's probably best to keep looking.

ACNB's cash from operating is positive, which is swell. It also is growing, which is very keen. Acnb's net cash change is positive, which is keen. It also is growing, which is very outstanding.

ACNB's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for acnb.

ACNB @ google finance

ACNB Corp.'s Moose Rating: 79%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick CASH

CASH's price to book is slimly lower than it's historical average. 0.6 price to book makes CASH look like a outstanding purchase.

CASH's P/E is only slightly lower than it's historical average. 9.4 P/E makes CASH look like a outstanding purchase. And price to book is extremely attractive. Looks like a outstanding buy overall.

CASH's CASH from operating is positive, which is keen. It also is growing, which is exceedingly keen. Cash's net CASH change is negative, which is bad. Still it is growing, which is good.

CASH's price is considerably lower than it's 20 day moving average. The most reasonable of technical analysis theories would suggest there is about an 80% chance CASH's price will correct itself, meaning it will go up. If the fundamental analysis is also good for this one, then it's probably as good a time as any to go long.

CASH @ google finance

Meta Financial Group, Inc.'s Moose Rating: 88%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick ANH

ANH's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. Still 0.9 is at best fair. May be acceptable for an exceedingly well known business. Otherwise it's probably best to put your money elsewhere.

ANH's P/E is only slightly lower than it's historical average. 7.0 P/E makes ANH look like a great deal. Even so The price to book is not that attractive, which is means it's probably best to keep looking.

ANH's cash from operating is positive, which is swell. It also is growing, which is exceedingly outstanding. Anh's net cash change is positive, which is outstanding. Still it is not growing, which is not so keen.

ANH's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for anh.

ANH @ google finance

Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporat's Moose Rating: 77%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick BCBP

BCBP's price to book is slenderly lower than it's historical average. All the same 0.9 is at best fair. May be acceptable for an exceedingly well known business. Otherwise it's probably best to put your money elsewhere.

The P/E ratio for BCBP is considerably lower than it's historical average. 5.3 P/E makes BCBP look like a outstanding steal. Nevertheless The price to book is not that attractive, which is means it's probably best to keep looking.

BCBP's cash from operating is positive, which is keen. Nevertheless it is not growing, which is not so swell. Bcbp's net cash change is positive, which is great. It also is growing, which is very keen.

BCBP's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for bcbp.

BCBP @ google finance

BCB Bancorp, Inc. (NJ)'s Moose Rating: 77%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.

Moose Pick XIN

The price to book ratio for XIN is considerably lower than it's historical average. 0.2 price to book makes XIN look like a swell deal.

The P/E ratio for XIN is considerably lower than it's historical average. 1.8 P/E makes XIN look like a great deal. And price to book is extremely attractive. Looks like a keen buy overall.

XIN's cash from operating is negative, which is bad. All the same it is growing, which is good. Xin's net cash change is positive, which is outstanding. All the same it is not growing, which is not so great.

XIN's price is not too far from it's 20 day moving average. No technical analysis suggestion for xin.

XIN @ google finance

Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.'s Moose Rating: 83%

This pick was made October 21, 2011.

Please keep in mind it is very important to review fundamental variables such as market cap, long term earnings history, and long term dividend history from many financial resources.